Mobile, Simple, FAST eye test developed (no training needed, either)

A typical Snellen chart. Originally developed ...

Image via Wikipedia

[Author’s aside:  What to write about?  Oh, I never have that problem.  And, right now, with all the annual meetings, new fiscal years, finished projects, and my holidays, I have a million things (ok, maybe only 842,123 of them) I want to share- but lack the time.  So, I may seem to jump from subject to subject more than usual now, trying to at least touch on some hot items….Please abide me- I probably have terminal ADD, anyway!]

We all clamor for smartphones- the newer the better.  Of course, with the new fees the providers are adding on, there may be some subsidence in demand, but I doubt it.  Even in developing countries, smartphones are the rage.  Afghanistan are paying their protectors (soldiers/police) via smartphones, so they don’t have to leave post to get funds to their families.  And, now, a group at MIT (two are on loan from Instituto de Informatica) have developed clip-on eyepiece to perform eye exams.

“So, what?”, you ask?  Well, there are 2 billion people with eyesight problems- at least 1/2 billion of them with no access to eye exams.  With this clip-on device ($2) and a smartphone ($300-500), almost any adult can have his eyesight analyzed and be on the way to better vision.  It tests for nearsightedness, farsightedness, and astigmatism!  (Smartphones now have cameras with sufficient resolution- on the order of 1/2 the width of human hair, or about the same resolution that the optometrist is using in his/her office.)

You are all familiar with the Snellen eye chart.  It’s a relatively easy test.  It is subjective (the patient response is critical), but one also needs lens kits ($ 600-1400) and a “theater” (a place where the chart, lenses, and patient can be in a controlled environment).  Enter NETRA, championed by Dr. Ramesh Raskar et. al. of the MIT Media Labs.  (The results were presented at Siggraph 2010.)  One looks through the eye piece and arranges red and green circles together. The number of clicks you need to align the dots provides your refractive index.

Compared to the Snellen method, the NETRA is:

  • subjective (same)
  • fast (much faster)
  • resolution of <0.5 D (0.25 D for Snellen)
  • requires no training (enough said)
  • total cost of $ 302 (vs. $1000 or more) for the apparati

You can read the paper here:

http://web.media.mit.edu/%7Epamplona/NETRA/Pamplona_et_al_SIGRAPH1010.pdf

Advertisements

About RAAckerman@Cerebrations.biz

A polymath whose interests span chemical engineering, medicine, biotechnology, business, management, among other areas. Among my inventions/developments: dialyzer, dialysate, neurosurgical drill, respiratory inspirometer, colon electrolyte lavages, urinary catheters, cardiac catheters, water reuse systems, drinking water system, ammonia degrading microbes, toxic chemical reduction via microbes, onsite waste water treatment, electronic health care information systems, bookkeeping and accounting programs, among others.
This entry was posted in Economy, Medicine, Technology and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s